- Technology Report
- Health Report
- Education Report
- Economics Report
- Arts & Culture
- Ask a Teacher
- Words And Their Stories
- AS IT IS
- Everyday Grammar
- This is America
- Science in the News
- In the News
- American Stories
- Trending Today
- U.S. History
- America's National Parks
- America's Presidents
- Agriculture Report
- Explorations
- People in America
Iran Talks Cause Rifts Among US Leaders
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
November 18,2013
WASHINGTON — Talks between world powers and Iran are scheduled to resume this week over the country’s controversial nuclear program. As details of a preliminary agreement begin to emerge, political leaders in the United States sharply disagree on the best way to move forward.
Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, U.S. television viewers have watched massive crowds in Iran shouting “death to America.”
Recently tens of thousands of Iranians turned out to mark the 34th anniversary of the seizure of the U.S. embassy in Tehran. That historical legacy still haunts many Americans.
Now that negotiations between Iran and world powers have resumed, some U.S. political leaders are expressing concern about potential outcomes.
“The question being asked in America, 'Is no deal better than a bad deal?' And that is why you see people on the Hill [Congress] and others saying slow down, don’t be fooled,” said Adam Ereli, a former U.S. Ambassador to Bahrain.
Negotiators are currently working on an interim agreement that would put limits on Iran’s nuclear program.
In return there would be some easing of severe economic sanctions currently crippling Iran’s economy.
Republicans in Congress accuse the Obama administration of agreeing to allow the Iranians to continue to enrich uranium, an idea they say is fatally flawed.
“Iranians have continuously cheated time after time, overruling both our Arab allies and Israel in their views of the disastrous consequences of this agreement," said Republican Senator John McCain. "It is a bad agreement.”
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has spent a great deal of time in the Middle East trying to reassure Israeli leaders. And Arab countries in the Persian Gulf region are also expressing concern.
“We do not want to go to war with Iran," said analyst Ereli. "And the nuclear program could lead to war. Let us be clear; everybody in the region is terrified of Iran getting a nuclear weapon.”
And if a deal is struck, Secretary Kerry will have to sell it.
“We are convinced that this will put us in a much stronger position, because it actually rolls back a danger to the Middle East, to Israel, to our friends in the region, and to ourselves,” he said.
Americans have already seen some thaw in relations.
For the first time in more than 30 years the two presidents spoke with each other on the phone.
But President Barack Obama says the bottom line remains the same.
“So our policy is Iran cannot have nuclear weapons," he said. "And I am leaving all options on the table to make sure that we meet that goal.”
The United States and other countries accuse Iran of seeking nuclear weapons, while Iran insists its program is for peaceful purposes.
Related Articles
- Top 5 Countdown for Week Ending November 23 (13/11/19)
- Scientists Debate, Prepare for Killer Asteroid (13/11/19)
- Agents Say JFK Assassination Transformed Secret Service (13/11/19)
- Iran Motivated for Nuclear Deal, but Tough Issues Remain (13/11/18)
- John Kennedy's Legacy Still Inspires 50 Years After His Death (13/11/18)
- Philippine Nurses in US Seek Help for Typhoon Survivors (13/11/17)
- Washington Week: Focus on Philippines Aid, Iran Nukes (13/11/17)
- Church, Charities Prove Crucial in Philippines Recovery (13/11/17)
- South Korea Looks to Increase Arms Exports (13/11/15)
- US Democracy Groups Mark 30 Years of Progress, Controversy (13/11/15)